Treatment-Resistant Depression: Next-Line Treatment Options for Providers

Smiling man standing beside a BrainsWay Deep TMS device in a treatment room.

Written by: Elle Warren
Reviewed by: Nina Kalus, PsyD., and Yalda Safai, MD, MPH

Key takeaways 

  • Before escalating treatment, confirm true treatment-resistant depression (TRD) rather than pseudo-resistance, most often from inadequate dose or duration, non-adherence, or an unrecognized comorbidity.

  • After two failed antidepressant trials, the likelihood of remission with additional medication trials declines;consider options beyond medication alone. 

  • Established TRDoptions include medication switching or augmentation, psychotherapy, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), and electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). Newer-generation options include esketamine, IV ketamine, and accelerated TMS protocols.

  • TMS is one established, noninvasive option among several next-line treatments. The appropriate choice depends on treatment history, symptom severity, urgency, tolerability, access, and patient preferences.

When a patient has failed the standard first- and second-line approaches to major depressive disorder (MDD), the next step isn’t always obvious. The best option depends on symptom severity, treatment history, and logistical and financial barriers. However, despite the name, there is treatment for treatment-resistant depression, which occurs in about 31% of people treated for depression. Once you confirm true resistance, it’s time to consider the full range of evidence-based, next-step options beyond medication alone. 

Confirming treatment resistance before you escalate

There is some debate among clinicians about the precise definition of treatment-resistant depression (TRD), also referred to as refractory depression, but the general consensus is two or more failed trials of antidepressants. 

However, it’s important to rule out what’s known as pseudo-resistance. In this case, a patient may appear treatment-resistant because: 

  • The medication dose was suboptimal 
  • The trial was discontinued early
  • Adherence was inconsistent
  • The diagnosis needs to be reconsidered 
  • An untreated comorbidity is exacerbating or maintaining depression symptoms
  • Substance use, medication interactions, or other medical factors are interfering

Often, says Stefani LaFrenierre, MD, psychiatrist and founder of Resiliency Mind+Body Medicine, “Patients aren’t fully treatment-resistant, they’re treatment-mismatched.”

Confirming true resistance matters because if a patient hasn’t received an adequate medication trial, the next best step may be optimization rather than escalation. If two medication trials have truly failed, continuing with a drug-first approach becomes less likely to provide results. 

Why waiting for another medication trial has diminishing returns

The STAR*D trial—a large, foundational study on sequential treatment for major depressive disorder—established that patients are far less likely to reach remission after two failed medication trials.

The four treatment steps and remission rates were:

  1. An SSRI (citalopram): 33% remission
  2. Medication switch or augmentation: If the first antidepressant (citalopram) didn’t work, patients either switched—to a new medication or cognitive therapy—or added a second treatment on top (another medication or cognitive therapy): 25% remission
  3. A third switch or augmentation (lithium or T3): 14% remission
  4. A fourth step (MAOI or venlafaxine–mirtazapine combination): 13% remission

The cumulative picture is more encouraging: across all four sequential treatment steps, an estimated 67% of patients eventually reached remission. That figure is a projection: it assumes the roughly one-third of participants who dropped out would have fared like those who stayed.

But the steep drop after two failed steps suggests that it makes sense to evaluate options beyond additional treatment-resistant depression medication, including TMS, which STAR*D did not assess.

Chart showing STAR*D remission rates dropping from 33% at step 1 to 13% at step 4

Established options for treatment-resistant depression

The established treatment-resistant depression treatment options include medication strategies (i.e. switching drug classes or augmentation), psychotherapy, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), and electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). 

Established TRD options at a glance

Response/
remission rate
Time to response Invasiveness Discontinuation rate Typical next step in sequencing
Medication strategies Varies, remission is typically <14% 4-8 weeks Noninvasive Varies, ~25% Another medication trial, psychotherapy, TMS, or ECT (depends on patient)
Psychotherapy Varies by type, response as high as 75%, remission up to 40% 8-12 weeks Noninvasive Varies, but typically lower than medication TMS or ECT
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) Standard TMS: 30% response,
19% remissionDeep TMS: 81.6% response (~4 out of 5 patients),
65.3% remission (~2 out of 3 patients)
4-6 weeks Noninvasive ~4.5% Emerging strategies such as esketamine or IV ketamine, ECT
Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) 74% response,
52% remission
As soon as one session More invasive ~34% TMS, emerging strategies such as esketamine or IV ketamine

Note: Response and remission data is difficult to compare directly, due to variables in patient population and other study factors. This data provides a general overview.

Medication strategies

There are two primary medication strategies that are used in TRD treatment: switching medication classes or augmenting with an additional medication. The classes of drugs used to treat depression, and their average range of efficacy, include:

  • Monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs): Remission rates range from 30%-47% for major depressive disorder (MDD) and may provide as high as a 56% response rate among TRD patients, though more research is needed. 
  • Tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs): Remission rates range from 46%-53% for MDD, and among TRD patients, TCAs have shown significantly lower success rates when compared with MAOIs. 
  • Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs): Remission rates range from 20%-39% for MDD, but since SSRIs tend to be a first or second trial choice, it’s unclear how likely they are to work after two failed trials.
  • Serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs): SNRIs have been found to have the highest remission rate and lowest drop-out rate compared to others. Remission rates for MDD range from 37%-67%, but they are not known to be particularly effective in the treatment of TRD. 
  • Atypical antidepressants (such as Wellbutrin or Remeron): Rather than a single class of medication, atypical antidepressants are a mixed bag. Common atypical antidepressants include Wellbutrin and Remeron. Remission rates of Wellbutrin for MDD range from 40%-47%, while for TRD patients, remission rates range from 13%-25%

Medication tolerability varies between individuals. That said, MAOIs and TCAs tend to have more serious side effects, which is why SSRIs and SNRIs are more common first-line approaches. 

With augmentation, a new medication is added alongside the antidepressant. According to a 2022 systematic review and meta-analysis, the most effective augmentation strategies for treatment-resistant depression include lithium (15.9% remission rate), T3 thyroid hormone (24.7% remission rate), and atypical antipsychotics (exact remission rate unknown, but in a 2015 meta-analysis, they showed significantly greater efficacy compared to placebo). 

Sam Zand, MD, psychiatrist and CEO of Anywhere Clinic, explains how to determine whether to switch classes or augment. “If it [the antidepressant] worked a little bit, we would try an augmentation. If it didn’t work at all, then we would switch to a different class.” He also notes that if a patient is having side effects, even ones that seem minor, then the medication is likely not going to be sustainable for them long-term and is worth switching.

Psychotherapy

Psychotherapy shouldn’t be treated as an afterthought when it comes to treatment-resistant depression treatment options. Multiple research studies have found it to be especially effective when used in conjunction with other treatment strategies, such as medication and TMS. The most common and effective types of psychotherapy used to treat depression and TRD include:

  • Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT)
  • Cognitive behavioral analysis system of psychotherapy (CBASP)
  • Dialectical behavioral therapy (DBT)
  • Psychodynamic therapy
  • Acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT)
  • Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT)
  • Interpersonal therapy (IPT)

While efficacy varies by type of psychotherapy and patient population, in a large trial of patients with treatment-resistant depression, 43% who received CBT maintained a response rate at nearly four years. CBASP, which was specifically developed for chronic depression, has demonstrated an 84% response rate and 44% remission rate among intensive inpatient program patients.

MBCT, which combines meditation with cognitive therapy, actually shows an improved response rate over time. One study of over 100 patients with TRD showed a 30% response rate at 8 weeks and 44% at 52 weeks. 

This data, plus the post-CBT relapse data above, points to a notable advantage of psychotherapy compared to medication: its durability. Patients are able to gain insight and skills that they can carry with them indefinitely. 

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)

TMS is FDA-approved to treat MDD and works by delivering magnetic pulses to the brain to alter brain activity. There are two primary types of TMS: standard TMS (also known as rTMS) and BrainsWay’s patented Deep TMS

Standard TMS, which is the original, first-generation type of TMS, is delivered with a figure-8 coil. It has a more narrow and surface-level reach compared to Deep TMS, with a 30% and 19% rate of response and remission, respectively, among patients with TRD. Deep TMS targets a wider, deeper area of the brain, leading to significantly stronger outcomes. Deep TMS has a respective 80% and 36% rate of response and remission.

TMS can also alleviate co-occurring anxiety symptoms and be a highly effective complement to other treatments, particularly medication and psychotherapy. In a 2023 meta-analysis, patients who received TMS while taking an antidepressant were 2.8 times as likely to experience remission compared to those who took an antidepressant and received a sham TMS treatment. TMS combined with psychotherapy has shown a 66% response rate and 56% remission rate, with 60% sustained remission at follow-up.

Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT)

ECT works by introducing a brief controlled seizure. While the goal is to establish a new rhythm within the brain’s neural functioning, its mechanism is not fully understood. Due to its intensity, patients are given general anesthesia during treatment. ECT has a poor reputation in the media and pop culture, often referred to as “shock treatment” and depicted as a painful, traumatic process. The reality is that ECT can be a highly effective treatment for TRD, with an average response and remission rate of 74% and 52%, respectively. 

Side effects—most notably short-term memory effects—are the tradeoff with ECT. Because of this potential to lead to ongoing cognitive impact, Dr. Zand explains that ECT is typically thought of as a last-line treatment for TRD.

Comparison chart of four TRD treatments—medication, psychotherapy, TMS, and ECT—by remission rate, speed, invasiveness, and discontinuation

Newer-generation options for TRD worth knowing

The psychiatric field is constantly evolving, and there are a variety of newer treatment options with strong bodies of evidence, including esketamine, IV ketamine, theta-burst and accelerated TMS, and psilocybin.

Esketamine

Esketamine is a potent version of ketamine administered by a clinician via nasal spray and is FDA-approved for TRD. According to a systematic review published in Current Neuropharmacology, ketamine is rapidly (within 24 hours) effective at reducing symptoms of depression—and has even been found to reduce suicidality. The side effect profile is generally low and decreases as treatment goes on. The most common adverse reactions include nausea, dissociation, dizziness, and headache. That said, it can slow reaction times, so driving afterward is prohibited. 

Both Dr. Zand and Dr. LaFrenierre underscore the effectiveness of esketamine. However, Dr. LaFrenierre says, it’s not always a long-term solution. “Over time, the efficacy of it starts to become similar to being on a maintenance antidepressant. About 30% of our patients stay in remission at the one-year mark with esketamine.” 

For ongoing treatment she says, “We transition into TMS to continue that momentum.”

IV ketamine

This is another way to receive ketamine treatment and shows similar levels of efficacy to esketamine, although it may act faster. Patients can notice results as soon as 40 minutes post-infusion. As with esketamine, driving afterward is not allowed. Both types of ketamine treatment require several sessions spread out over several weeks, but of course, an IV is more invasive than nasal spray.

Theta-burst and accelerated TMS protocols

Many TMS devices now have newer, FDA-approved protocols that make treatment sessions shorter and, in the case of accelerated TMS, allow for a faster course of treatment. 

The theta-burst protocol, available with both standard TMS and Deep TMS devices, shortens the length of treatment sessions. The accelerated TMS protocol, also approved between both types of TMS, compresses the length of treatment sessions as well as the course of treatment. Sessions are completed in just 4-10 days, depending on the device. BrainsWay’s proprietary SWIFT protocol, for example, is 38 sessions. The accelerated protocol used for most other devices, the SAINT protocol, is 50 sessions. 

Theta-burst and accelerated TMS display similar efficacy to the typical length and course of treatment, but the shorter sessions and course of treatment allows for faster results and easier scheduling.

CTA: BrainsWay offers devices for Deep TMS and Accelerated TMS

Psilocybin

Psilocybin, the psychedelic compound found in certain mushrooms, is gaining momentum in psychiatry. In April 2026, an executive order directed federal agencies to speed up research and access to psychedelic treatments for serious mental illness. In July, Compass Pathways released six-month results from its trial of synthetic psilocybin for treatment-resistant depression: 39% of patients on the high dose saw a meaningful drop in symptoms after two doses, and on average that benefit lasted six months. The results are promising but modest, and they come from the company developing the drug. They haven’t been peer-reviewed yet.

Investigational and emerging directions

The need for faster, more effective treatment options for TRD has driven research into several mechanisms, including: 

  • Glutamine receptor modulators: Depression is associated with impaired glutamate signaling and reduced neuroplasticity. This is the most advanced of these directions; ketamine and esketamine already act here.
  • GABA modulators: MDD has been linked to lower GABA levels.
  • Opioid-system agents: Anhedonia, a core symptom of depression, is regulated in part by the brain’s opioid system.
  • Anti-inflammatory agents: Proinflammatory activity may contribute to the onset of depressive episodes.

Evidence for these approaches varies quite a bit. Glutamine receptor modulators have produced approved treatments; the others remain earlier in development and are worth watching as research progresses. 

Choosing treatment-resistant depression treatment options for a specific patient

Choosing the best TRD treatment option for a specific patient comes down to a number of factors, including the severity of their symptoms, prior treatment response, and logistical and financial barriers.  

“Although we want to prioritize what’s best, we have to also incorporate [the patient’s] social situation,” says Dr. Zand, “and that includes cost, insurance coverage, transportation, schedule, and urgency.” 

  • If a patient needs fast relief: Try accelerated TMS, esketamine, IV ketamine, or, as a last-line option, ECT.
  • If a patient is having some success with medication: Try augmenting with lithium, T3, an atypical antipsychotic, or, for a non-pharmacological approach, supplement with TMS or psychotherapy. 
  • If a patient has failed two different classes of medication: Consider non-pharmacological options such as psychotherapy or TMS. STAR*D  shows diminishing remission rates with each successive medication step, though it did not compare these approaches directly..
  • If a patient has transportation or scheduling barriers: Some treatments, like TMS, ECT, esketamine, IV ketamine, require frequent in-office visits, impact a patient’s ability to drive afterward, or, in the case of ECT, have the potential to cause short-term memory loss. If any of these factors are a non-starter, try psychotherapy or a medication strategy.
  • If a patient has insurance or financial barriers: Some insurance plans may require three or four medication trials before approving something like TMS or ECT. Document failed trials thoroughly; prior authorization for TMS or ECT typically requires it. In the meantime, try augmentation if medication is somewhat working or switch to a different class if not.

Flowchart for choosing TRD treatment options based on urgency, partial medication response, and number of failed medication classes.

Where TMS fits in this picture

TMS is one established option with the broader TRD next-line treatment options framework, displaying significant rates of response, remission, and durability with minimal side effects. Dr. LaFrenierre says Deep TMS is the go-to next-line treatment option at her clinic. “We have a 70%-75% remission rate, and an 85%-90% response rate.”  

TMS is also covered by insurance, though some plans may require a certain number of medication failures before approving.  

CTA: BrainsWay offers FDA-cleared Deep TMS systems

The bottom line

After two failed antidepressant trials, the chances of TRD patients finding relief from medication alone dramatically declines. However, treatment-resistant major depression is treatable when considering the broader landscape of options, such as psychotherapy, TMS, ECT, and newer-generation treatments like esketamine, IV ketamine, and newer TMS protocols. When choosing the best next step for a specific patient, providers should factor in symptom severity, treatment history, and logistical barriers. 

Frequently asked questions (FAQs)

What is the gold standard treatment for treatment-resistant depression?

There is no single gold standard treatment for every patient with treatment-resistant depression (TRD), as it depends on their symptom severity, treatment history, and any logistical barriers. ECT, Deep TMS, and psychotherapy have some of the strongest efficacy data. When a case calls for a rapid response, the best options tend to include esketamine, IV ketamine, accelerated TMS, and ECT. 

How is treatment-resistant depression diagnosed in practice?

In practice, treatment resistance generally means that a patient has failed to respond adequately to at least two appropriate antidepressant trials. Before escalating treatment, providers should rule out pseudo-resistance caused by inadequate dosing or duration, inconsistent adherence, diagnostic uncertainty, untreated comorbidities, substance use, interactions, or other medical factors. 

What newer treatments are available for treatment-resistant depression?

Newer-generation options for treatment-resistant depression (TRD) include esketamine, IV ketamine, theta-burst and accelerated TMS protocols. Investigational approaches—such as psilocybin, currently available only through clinical trials, and approaches targeting inflammatory pathways—remain in development. Their regulatory status and evidence bases differ quite a bit: esketamine is FDA-approved for TRD and TMS is FDA-cleared, while IV ketamine is used off-label..

When should a patient be referred for TMS therapy instead of another medication trial?

After a patient has failed two or more adequate antidepressant trials, TMS, or transcranial magnetic stimulation, becomes a reasonable candidate for the next-line treatment discussion. Providers should consider referral particularly when the patient wants a noninvasive option, has concerns about medication tolerability, or hasn’t achieved adequate benefit from medication-based strategies.

Reference:

Rush AJ, et al. Acute and longer-term outcomes in depressed outpatients requiring one or several treatment steps: a STAR*D report. Am J Psychiatry. 2006;163:1905–1917.